COVID-19 TRIGGERED TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCED STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN BLENDED LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.1616Keywords:
Higher Education; Student Engagement; Blended Learning; Technology Integration; Instructional Strategies; Life-long LearningAbstract
Purpose: This study reflects on three technology integration strategies for enhanced student engagement, namely; keeping the learning social, keeping the learning authentic, and ensuring that the technology adds value to learning.
Methodology: The study employed a student technology profiling survey involving 3rd Year Cell Molecular Biology, Microbiology and Genetics students at the University of Namibia in 2021. The survey used a Google Document whose link was distributed to students through class WhatsApp group. Further, literature is reviewed on student engagement, and blended learning. The data was qualitatively presented using graphs.
Findings: The study revealed that keeping the learning social ensures learning from sociocultural perspectives, and allows for social constructivist methods of learning while the adoption of authentic learning as a pedagogical model can help to better prepare students for professional practice. Teachers can ensure that technology integration adds value by using instructional strategies that stimulate students into engaging with higher-level cognitive skills and differentiated learning. The study found that based on the nature of the course under review, we identified the Flipped Classroom model and the Enriched-Virtual model is most appropriate blended learning modes for full-time students and distance students, respectively.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: It is recommended that higher education institutions should consider redesigning their curriculum policies in order to integrate blended learning in all their courses in order to improve the quality of education, enhance student learning and engagement, as well as overall quality of the university graduates.
Downloads
References
Al-Ataby, A. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Teaching in COVID-19 Era: Challenges and Recommendations. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(10), 317-331.
Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the University classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379088
Barnett, R. (2004). The purposes of higher education and the changing face of academia. London Review of Education, 2(1), 61–73. DOI: 10.1080/1474846042000177483
Blake, R. J. (2005). Bimodal chatting: The glue of a distance language learning course. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497–511.
Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., Alexander, L., Watters, K., Wood, D., Ivala, E., & Herrington, J. (2013). The use of emerging technologies for authentic learning: A South African study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12046
Chen, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1255
Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124(March), 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
Clarke, T., & Hermens, A. (2001). Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning. Education + Training, 43(4), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910110399328
Delialioǧlu, Ö. (2012). Student engagement in blended learning environments with lecture-based and problem-based instructional approaches. Educational Technology and Society, 15(3), 310–322. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.298.8303&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Demuyakor, J. (2021). “COVID-19 Pandemic and Higher Education: Leveraging on Digital Technologies and Mobile Applications for Online Learning in Ghana.”. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 26-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3904
Dewi, K. C., Ciptayani, P. I., Surjono, H. D., & Priyanto. (2018). Critical Success Factor for Implementing Vocational Blended Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012086
Fong, J., & Wang, F. L. (2007). Blended Learning. In J. Fong & F. L. Wang (Eds.), Workshop on Blended Learning (pp. 1–8). Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Pearson.
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the quality of e-learning at the degree level in the student experience of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning Journal, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(25), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3
Herrington, J. (2006). Authentic e-learning in higher education: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN) (pp. 1–10). Chesapeake, Va: University of Wollongong.
Jalinus, N., Verawardina, U., Krismadinata, Nabawi, R. A., & Darma, Y. (2021). Developing blended learning model in vocational education based on 21st century integrated learning and industrial revolution 4.0. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 1239–1254. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i9.3480
Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating Constructivism into Instructional Design: Potential and Limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17–27.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
Kim, J. H. Y. (2013). Types of Blended Instruction: Different Approaches to Different Mixes (pp. 474–484). Savannah, GA 31406. https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings13/2013i/13_21.pdf
Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 8(2), 50–68. http://dx.doi.org/10125/25240
Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Learner and Instructional Factors Influencing Learning Outcomes within a Blended Learning Environment. Source: Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282–293. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.12.4.282.pdf
Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600803311
Magesa, E., & Josua, L. (2022). Use of Technology to Morph Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Post COVID-19 Era. Creative Education. Creative Education, 13, 846-853. doi:10.4236/ce.2022.133055
Milheim, W. (2006). Strategies for the Design and Delivery of Blended Learning Courses. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 46(6), 44–47.
Min, Q., & Wu, G. (2017). A Blended Learning Strategy for Professional English Course in a Cloud Learning Environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(8), 608–611. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.8.940
Moluayonge, G. (2020). The use of modern educational technologies in remote learning in higher education during a pandemic: The case of COVID-19 in Cameroon. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(3), 479-484.
Nehme, Z. Z., Seakhoa-King, A., & Ali, S. (2015). Technology Blended Learning Approaches and the Level of Student Engagement with Subject Content. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 13(2), 179–194. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2684710
Ng, C. S. L., & Cheung, W. S. (2007). Comparing face to face, tutor led discussion and online discussion in the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1246
Nurkamto, J. M., Mujiyanto, J., & Yuliasri, I. (2019). The Implementation of Station Rotation and Flipped Classroom Models of Blended Learning in EFL Learning. English Language Teaching, 12(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n12p23
Pawan, F., Paulus, T. M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 119–140. http://dx.doi.org/10125/25217
Sahni, J. (2019). Applying technology to enhance student satisfaction and engagement: Case of business students. TEM Journal, 8(2), 623–629. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM82-41
Setiyani, R., Harnanik, Lianingsih, S., & Susilowati, N. (2020). Using the Blended Learning to Enhance Students’ Engagement and Learning Experience in Taxation. In International Conference on Economics, Business and Economic Education 2019 (Vol. 2020, pp. 397–408). KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6615
Siraj, K. & Maskari, A. Al. (2018). Student engagement in blended learning instructional design: an analytical study. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 15(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v15.n2.283
Staker, H., & Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K – 12 Blended Learning. INNOSIGHT Institute. https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf
Wang, M. J. (2010). Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 830–846. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1045
Wornyo, A. A., Klu, E. K., & Motlhaka, H. (2018). Authentic Learning: Enhancing Learners’ Academic Literacy Skills. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.4p.56
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. Timothy Sibanda, Lukas Matati Josua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
