POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT SURROUNDING THE LAND CONFLICT IN AMURU DISTRICT ACHOLI SUB-REGION
Keywords:
Political Environment, Land ConflictAbstract
Purpose: To examine the political environment surrounding the land conflict in Amuru district Acholi sub-region.
Methodology: The study employed a descriptive research design involving both qualitative and quantitative studies where 5 focus group discussions with 40 women and 40 men from Pabbo, Amuru and Lamogi sub counties of Amuru district and key interviews with 4 participants from Area Land Committee members and other leaders in the above sub counties.
Findings: The findings indicate that over 90% of rural land is understood by the people who live there as under communal control/ownership. These communal land owners are variously understood as clans, sub-clans or extended families. Ethnic based land tensions fostered insecurity and instability in the Amuru as people could not walk around freely, access their gardens, were displaced and this in turn affected their ability to make a living through accessing the land. I also found that many women had relational access to land through their marriage and relationship with male kin and this seemed to give them fragile land rights. Men on the other hand had firm control over land and made final decisions relating to sales and land use.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Having a study on land conflict in areas such as Amuru District in the Acholi-sub region which is one of the recently created districts in west Acholi in northern Uganda is very important. In addition land in Amuru district is a vital resource that defines the livelihoods, identity and relationship with ancestors of people. Research into political environment surrounding the land conflict in Amuru District Acholi sub-region will devise long term grassroots land dispute resolution structures into to increase the capacity of these structures by training, along with ‘sensitising’ communities to their land rights, access, control and ownership rights. In the same way the study area and can be used to identify research gaps for further study.
Downloads
References
Amuru District Profile Analysis (2012), “Training of District Staff on Conflict Sensitive Approaches to Development”.Yngstrom, Ingrid (2002). ‘Women, Wives and Land Rights in Africa: Situating Gender Beyond the Household in the Debate Over Land Policy and Changing Tenure Systems’. Oxford Development Studies, 30 (1): 21-36.
Anderson ER, Sewankambo F,Vandergrift K (2005) Pawns of Politics: Children, Conflict and Peace in Northern Uganda (Kampala: World Vision International)
Asiimwe, Jacqueline (2001). ‘Making Women’s Land Rights a Reality in Uganda: Advocacy for Co-ownership by Spouses’. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 4(1): 171-187.
Chanock, Martin (1991). ‘A Peculiar Sharpness: An Essay on Property in the History of Customary Law in Colonial Africa’. The Journal of African History, 32(1): 65-88. Amanda,
Grabe, Shelly (2010). ‘Promoting Gender Equality: The Role of Ideology, Power and Control in the Link Between Land Ownership and Violence in Nicaragua’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public, 10(1): 146-170.
Jacobs, Susie (1997). ‘Land to the tiller? Gender Relations and Land Reforms’. Society in Transition, 1(4): 82-100.
Parwez, M. (2011). ‘Customary Law and Women’s Empowerment: Case of Dimasa and Karbi of Assam’. Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 71(2010-2011): 1196-1207.
Pham P, Vinck P, Stover E (2007) Abducted: The Lord’s Resistance Army and Forced Conscription in Northern Uganda (Berkeley-Tulane Initiative on Vulnerable Populations)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
