Exploring the Misuse of Public-Private Partnerships in Kenya’s Public Procurement: A Study of Governance, Accountability, and Implementation Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jppa.3332Keywords:
Public Procurement, Tendering, Bidding, Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), Corruption, Conflict, Interest, Political InfluenceAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the Misuse of Public-Private Partnerships in Kenya’s Public Procurement.
Methodology: In this research, a qualitative research methodology was adopted, with a focus on desktop research as the main method for data collection.
Findings: The study found that Political influence significantly erodes the integrity of PPP procurement processes in Kenya. Often, politicians and government officials leverage their authority to get contracts for firms or individuals that matches with their interests, frequently disregarding the technical and financial qualifications of bidders. The findings also revealed that bribery among other incentives are major concerns in public procurement environment in Kenya, particularly in relation to PPPs. Public officials, as well as those that are involved in procurement, frequently solicit kickbacks from private Companies in return for preferential treatment in contract awards. Lastly, the study revealed that competition is significantly hindered by unclear tendering procedures, selective bidding invitations, and unfair disqualifications of competitors.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study provides a unique contribution to the theory, practice, and policy surrounding Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Kenya by highlighting the interplay of political influence, corruption, and institutional shortcomings in procurement processes. The Principal-Agent Theory and Theory of Institutionalism demonstrate how government contracts, intended to be executed transparently and efficiently, often suffer due to favoritism, nepotism, and weak regulatory enforcement. The findings emphasize the need for stronger regulations, transparent tendering procedures, and improved transparency to curb corruption and ensure competition. In practice, this demands reforming procurement laws, bolstering the capacity of oversight institutions, and ensuring a merit-based, transparent process. Policy wise, the study advocates for comprehensive legal reforms, the establishment of digital platforms for procurement management, and the enforcement of anti-corruption laws to foster a fairer, more competitive environment in public procurement, ultimately enhancing public trust and ensuring wise use of public resources.
Downloads
References
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2018). Digital Procurement: Guidance for Government Reform. Manila: ADB.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
Githongo, J. (2022). Patronage and procurement: Unpacking political favoritism in Kenya’s infrastructure deals. Nairobi: Transparency Kenya Press.
Githongo, J. (2022). Political expediency and infrastructure delivery in Kenya: A double-edged sword. Nairobi: Africa Centre for Governance Studies.
Institute of Economic Affairs [IEA]. (2022). Re-examining the Nairobi Expressway PPP: Issues of transparency and governance. Nairobi: IEA Kenya.
Institute of Economic Affairs. (2022). Analysis of the Public-Private Partnerships (Amendment) Act, 2021. Institute of Economic Affairs Kenya.
Juma, L. (2020). The role of transparency in public procurement: Addressing the misuse of public-private partnerships in Kenya. African Governance Review, 8(3), 45-60.
Juma, T. (2020). Political influence in public procurement in Kenya. Nairobi: Public Policy Institute.
Juma, V. (2020). Procurement opacity and accountability in Kenya’s public-private projects. African Journal of Public Administration, 9(1), 22–35.
Juma, V. (2020). Transparency and Accountability in Urban Redevelopment Projects: The Case of Nairobi Railway City. Journal of African Public Policy, 11(1), 22–34.
Kariuki, E. (2018). Corruption in public procurement: The case of Kenya. Nairobi: Kenya Anti-Corruption Research Institute.
Kariuki, F. (2018). Public procurement in Kenya: Legal framework and implementation challenges. Law and Policy Review, 6(2), 45–58.
Kariuki, F. (2018). Unfair Competition in Kenyan Public Procurement: A Case for Reform. East African Law Review, 4(2), 55–68.
Kariuki, J. (2018). The challenges of regulating public-private partnerships in Kenya: A case study of the legal and regulatory frameworks. Journal of Public Procurement, 15(2), 101-115.
Kariuki, S. M., & Nyongesa, M. (2018). Public-Private Partnerships in Kenya: Challenges and prospects. Nairobi University Press.
Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA). (2022). Public Procurement Integrity and Competitive Bidding in Kenya. Nairobi: KIPPRA Policy Brief No. 97.
Lane, J. E. (2005). Public administration and public management: The principal-agent perspective. Routledge.
Mburu, M. (2019). The cost of corruption in Kenya’s infrastructure projects. Journal of African Public Policy, 7(2), 45–63.
Mburu, S. (2019). Nepotism, cronyism, and inefficiency in public-private partnerships: The Kenyan experience. East African Journal of Development Studies, 5(3), 71–89.
Mburu, T. (2019). Public-private partnerships in Kenya: A critical assessment of corruption risks and their impact on the economy. African Economic Review, 21(1), 115-128.
Mwaniki, D. (2017). Institutional capacity and the management of public-private partnerships in Kenya. African Journal of Public Administration, 4(1), 28-40.
Mwaniki, M. (2017). Institutional weaknesses in Kenya’s public procurement system. African Journal of Public Administration, 4(1), 22–38.
Mwaura, P. (2020). The role of public-private partnerships in infrastructure development in Kenya. Kenya Economic Review, 12(4), 89-102.
Njiru, J. (2017). PPP infrastructure projects and economic development: Case study of Kenya. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(7), 613-628.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Ochanda, F. A. (2021). Governance and accountability in public procurement in Kenya: An examination of PPP models. African Journal of Governance and Development, 5(2), 123-140.
Ochieng, R., & Price, A. D. (2019). PPP success in Africa: Examining the case of Kenya. Journal of African Business, 20(1), 45-67.
OECD. (2015). Public-private partnerships in developing countries: Lessons learned from international experience. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2015). Recommendation of the Council on principles for public governance of public-private partnerships. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2016). Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Office of the Auditor-General. (2018). Audit of public infrastructure funds in the Ministry of Roads and Public Works. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Office of the Auditor-General. (2021). Annual reports on national projects. Nairobi: Government Printer.
Okello, D. (2020). Corruption and inefficiency in public procurement: Evidence from Kenya’s PPP projects. Journal of Development Economics, 33(2), 56-70.
Okumu, M., & Makokha, M. (2021). Favoritism and corruption in Kenya’s public procurement: Case studies in the healthcare sector. Journal of Procurement Research, 15(3), 85-98.
Okumu, W., & Makokha, R. (2021). Clientelism in public-private partnerships: Evidence from county-level projects in Kenya. East African Policy Review, 3(1), 56–74.
Parliament of Kenya. (2020). Report on the Managed Equipment Services (MES) program. Departmental Committee on Health.
Piga, G., & Thai, K. V. (Eds.). (2007). Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation and Knowledge-Sharing. Boca Raton, FL: PrAcademics Press.
Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA). (2021). Annual Procurement Performance Review Report 2020/2021. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Schapper, P. R., Malta, J. N. V., & Gilbert, D. L. (2006). An analytical framework for the management and reform of public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 6(1–3), 1–26.
Thuo, M., & Mutua, S. (2019). Political interference in public-private partnerships in Kenya: Implications for governance and project delivery. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(4), 234-250.
Thuo, N., & Mutua, M. (2019). Political capture in Kenya’s PPP framework: The case of Nairobi County. Journal of African Governance, 7(2), 58–72.
Thuo, N., & Mutua, M. (2019). Political Patronage and Public Procurement in Kenya: A Case Study of Kisumu County. African Journal of Governance and Development, 6(3), 75–89.
Thuo, V., & Mutua, M. (2019). The role of political connections in public contracting in Kenya. Policy Brief No. 17, Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA).
Transparency International Kenya. (2022). Public Procurement in Kenya: A Corruption Risk Assessment. Nairobi: TI-Kenya.
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023.
Tse, K., & Wang, T. (2020). Competitive bidding and its role in improving public procurement transparency in Kenya. International Journal of Procurement and Governance, 8(1), 58-74.
Tse, R. Y. C., & Wang, K. (2020). Transparency and competition in public-private partnerships: Lessons for Africa. Journal of Procurement Policy, 11(3), 110–128.
UNCAC (United Nations Convention Against Corruption). (2019). Technical Guide to the Implementation of the UNCAC. New York: UNODC.
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2020). Enhancing Government Procurement for Better Infrastructure Outcomes in Kenya. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
World Bank. (2020). Kenya Economic Update: Navigating the Pandemic. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Henry Kiogora Thiga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
