The Democratic Agent in the Writings of Ibn Khaldun, John Milton and Thomas Hobbes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijhr.1764Keywords:
Democratic Agent, Governance, Social ThinkersAbstract
Purpose: This paper seeks to pinpoint the notion of democracy and the democratic agent which were put forward by the 14th-century historiographer and historian Ibn Khaldun, the 17th century poet, John Milton and the philosopher Thomas Hobbes. In this regard, the paper proposes to bring to the fore different perceptions of the notion of democratic agent which were expounded by these thinkers. Ibn Khladun in his Muqqaddima is still regarded as the founder of modern sociology who is far ahead of his time. His theory of good governance based on his monumental work, al-Muqaddimah is still subject to diverse discussions and attention. He is reckoned as the founder of the science of human society as well as the forerunner of the original theories in social science, philosophy of history and economics. He has been described as the first Muslim scholar to write about the science of umran (urbanism). In his book entitled al-Muqaddimah (an Introduction) Ibn Khaldun exposed opinions about good governance which were fully detailed throughout several chapters of Al Muqaddimah.
Methodology: The method used secondary sources from the writtings of Ibn Khaldun, John Milton and Thomas Hobbes.
Findings: The study found out that there is no unique democratic agent heralding one truth, there were different elaborations and understanding of the relation between the government and the governed.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study concluded that each thinker buttressed his ideas which were intrinsically framed by his political environment, his religion and his perceptions of the problems encompassing the period they lived in.
Downloads
References
Baali, F. (1988). Society, state and urbanism: Ibn Khaldun’s sociological thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Campo, J. E. (2009). Ibn Khaldun, Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad. In Campo, Juan E. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Islam. New York: Facts of File. 334–335.
Enan, M. A. (1979). Ibn Khaldun: His life and works. New Delhi: Kitab Bhavan.
Gierer, A. (2001). Ibn Khaldun on solidarity (“asabiyyah”) – modern science on cooperativeness and empathy: A comparison. In Philosophia naturalis. Germany: Vittorio Klostermann. 38 (1), 91-104
Ibn Khaldun, A. (2000). Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Mohammad, M. T. S. (2010). Principles of sustainable development in Ibn Khaldun’s economic thought. Malaysian journal of real estate. Vol. 5. No. 1. 1-18.
Mujahidin, M. (2018). The concept of economic thought Ibn Khaldun. Munich Personal RePec Archive (MPRA) Retrieve https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/87143/1/MPRA_paper_87143.pd
Soofi, A. S. (1995). Economics of Ibn Khaldun revisited. In History of political economy. Duke University Press. 27 (2) 387-404.
Books about Milton
Hill Chirstopher, God's Englishman (1972 edition), p. 200.
Hughes Ann, 'Milton, Areopagitica, and the Parliamentary Cause', The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. Nicholas McDowell and Nigel Smith, Oxford University Press, 2009
Hoxby Blair, 'Areopagitica and Liberty', The Oxford Handbook of Milton, ed. Nicholas McDowell and Nigel Smith, Oxford University Press, 2009
Lim Walter , John Milton, Radical Politics, and Biblical Republicanism (2006), p. 141.
Rogers John , The Matter of Revolution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998), p. xi.
Smith Nigel, Popular Republicanism in the 1650s: John Streater's 'heroick mechanics', p. 154, in David Armitage, Armand Himy, Quentin Skinner (editors), Milton and Republicanism (1998).
Sullivan C, 'Milton and the Beginning of Civil Service', in Literature in the Public Service (2013), Ch. 2.
Woolrych Austin, Commonwealth to Protectorate (1982), p. 34.
Worden Blair, Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell and Marchamont Nedham (2007), Ch. 14, Milton and the Good Old Cause.
Books about Hobbes
Abizadeh, A., 2011, “Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory”, American Political Science Review, 105 (2): 298–315.
–––, 2018, Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armitage, D., 2007, “Hobbes and the foundations of modern international thought”, in Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baumgold, D., 1988, Hobbes’s Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bejan, T.M., 2010, “Teaching the Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Education”, Oxford Review of Education, 36(5): 607–626.
Ewin, R.E., 1991, Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, Boulder: Westview Press.
Finn, S., 2006, Thomas Hobbes and the Politics of Natural Philosophy, London: Continuum Press.
Goldsmith, M. M., 1966, Hobbes’s Science of Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.
Malcolm, N., 2002, Aspects of Hobbes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skinner, Q., 1996, Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
–––, 2002, Visions of Politics Volume 3: Hobbes and Civil Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
–––, 2005, “Hobbes on Representation”, European Journal of Philosophy, 13 (2): 155–184.
Sommerville, J., 1992, Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context, London: Macmillan.
Zagorin, P., 2009, Hobbes and the Law of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Simon Alemba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
