Historical Scholarship and Strategic Studies: A Relationship Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijhr.1856Keywords:
History, Strategy, Strategic Studies, Historiography, ScholarshipAbstract
Purpose: The idea of placing two disciplines side by side in order to establish some level of scholarly links and interconnectedness has gained due attention in recent times. Emerging challenges and the urgent need to salvage the dwindling fortunes that is usually associated with some academic disciplines make it expedient for an academic innovation that is sustainable. Until the mid-19th century, disciplines were studied in their own rights without a conscious effort to overlap. In the discipline of history, the institutional changes occasioned by the University curriculum review in Cambridge University during the same era marked a turning point in the development of historical scholarship. Hence, sub-disciplines began to be evolved from the parent discipline of history. Consequently, sub-disciplines like Economic History, Social History, and so on began to emerge. The multiplicity of these sub-disciplines has further placed on the historian the responsibility to not only justify the reason(s) for the offshoot, but to demonstrate the relationship between history as a discipline and the sub-discipline. This study argues that Strategic Studies is a recent discipline when considered with other disciplines that pegged alongside History as an academic field. It is against this backdrop, that this study looks at the discipline of history bearing in mind at what point it became expedient for a diversification in the domain of history. The study also attempts a brief historical development of the sub discipline of strategic studies. This study further argues that, there is a nexus between history and strategic studies which is mutually reinforcing.
Methodology: The study adopts a qualitative approach in analyzing the scholarly relationship between the two realms with the domain of history as the epicenter.
Findings: historical approach to strategic/security studies has always been and still remains a very powerful analytical tool provided it is handed with the necessary care.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that strategic studies is a recent discipline that should be considered as a disciplines that pegged alongside History as an academic field.
Downloads
References
Ahmadu Bello University; Department of Political Science, NEW DEGREE PROGRAMME: BSc International Studies FBA SS 192/IC. C. 1980. 1
Aworawo, D. (2017). “History and Diplomacy: Theory and Practice”, In (Ed) R.T. Akinyele, History & Diplomacy, Essays in Honour of Ade Adefuye. New Jersey: Goldline and Jacobs Publishing. 132-149
Clausewitz, Von C. (1989). On War In M. Howard & P. Paret, (eds) Princeton, New Jersey: University Press. 516-583
Crookall, R. C. (1972) Handbook for History Teachers in Africa. Ibadan: Evans. 2
Edward Harlett Carr. (1984) What is History? London: Penguin. 55
Evans, G. & Newnham, J. (1998). The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations. Penguin Books. 66
Evera,Van S. (1999). Causes of war: Power and the roots of conflicts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 576
Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 54
Gat, A. (2001). A History of Military thought from the Enlightenment to the Cold war. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 124. 35-80
Herman, et al (2002). Military Advantage in History. Washington DC. Booz Allen Hamilton. 195-197
Howard, M. (1983). The Causes of Wars. London: Temple Smith. 195-197
Igwe, Obasi. (1989). A Modern Introduction to Strategic Studies. Enugu, Prince Production. 3-4
Johnston, A.I. (1998). Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 278
Machiavelli, N. (2008). The Art of War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 54-57
Makhen, T. G. (2002). Uncovering ways of war: US intelligence and Foreign Military innovation, 1918-1941. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 57
Mordi, E. (1987). “Government-Press Relations in Nigeria: A Historical Study of the Political Role of the Nigerian Press, 1937-75” Ph.D Thesis Proposal, Department of History, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. 3-16
Olsen, J.A., & Gray, C.S. (2001). The Practice of Strategy: From Alexander the Great to the Present. Oxford:, Oxford University Press. 6-11
Singer, J. D. (1980) The Correlates of War. Volume 2, New York: Free Press. 48
Smith, M.L.R. (1995). Fighting For Ireland? The Military Strategy of the Irish Republican Movement London: Routledge. 3
Walton, C. D. (2002). The Myth of Inevitable defeat in Vietnam. London: Frank Cass. 14
Weltman, J. J. (1995). World Politics and the evolution of war. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. 234
Whaley, B. (1969) Stratagem: Deception and surprise in war: Cambridge: MIT Press. 72
Yarger, Harry R. (2006). Strategic Theory of for the 21st Century: The Little Book on Big Strategy Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute. 2-5
https://oxfordre.com_oxfordresearchresearchencyclopediasDec2017 DOI10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013. Accessed 7th August, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eneji Joseph Eneji, Ayomide Oluwadamilola Ojo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
