Influence of Team Negotiations on Collaborative Value within Ashoka Fellows' Organizations in Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jhrl.1693Keywords:
Team Negotiations, Collaborative Value, Ashoka Fellows' OrganizationsAbstract
Purpose: The study sought to determine the influence of team negotiations on collaborative value within Ashoka Fellows' Organizations in Africa
Methodology: The study applied pragmatism philosophy to offer several ways to bridge dichotomies in mixed methods approaches to social science. Explanatory sequential mixed-method research design consisting of two distinct phases, namely quantitative and qualitative, was adopted. Both qualitative and quantitative study methods were adopted. In the quantitative study, the target population constituted all the 154 Ashoka Fellows' Organizations working in 19 countries in Africa. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire administered online to the founders (Ashoka Fellows) or the Ashoka Fellows' Organizations' CEOs. One hundred responded by filling out the questionnaire, which translated to a 64.9% response rate. Additionally, qualitative data applied purposive sampling and selected six Ashoka regional team leaders in Africa for in-depth interviews. They all were available for the interviews translating to a 100% response rate. Data analysis techniques combined descriptive and inferential statistics. Statistical Package for Social Sciences and SmartPLS 3 software were used to analyze the collected data.
Findings: The study results revealed that team negotiation significantly influences collaborative value within Ashoka Fellows’ Organizations in Africa. Team Negotiations have a significant influence on collaborative value with an R2 = 0.214, chi-square X2 (10, N=100) = 72.319, p<.05, SRMR=0.090, Rms-theta=0.234, and NFI=0.773. The null hypothesis was rejected.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that negotiating teams should ensure that they know as much as possible about the other side of the negotiation. The teams' perception is vital in the negotiating team's preparedness as they should be aware of what is necessary at every stage of the negotiating process. When negotiating, the focus should be on looking for alternative ways of dealing with the problem before finding a solution that satisfies all members. The evaluation of options during team negotiations should be objective. At large, the negotiating teams should ensure that all members feel comfortable with the solution to the problem raised before making the steps to implement the solution.
Downloads
References
Aykac, T., Wilken, R., Jacob, F., & Prime, N. (2017). Why teams achieve higher negotiation profits than individuals : The mediating role of deceptive tactics. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2015-0179
Cordell, A., Bandler, R., Grinder, J., Berrien, F. K., Boddy, D., Paton, S., … Walker, D. (2019). Team negotiations: an examination of integrative and distributive bargaining. In The Negotiation Handbook (Vol. 81, pp. 105–139). Pearson USA.
Gelfand, M. J., Brett, J., Gunia, B. C., Imai, L., Huang, T. J., & Hsu, B. F. (2013). Toward a Culture-by-Context Perspective on Negotiation: Negotiating Teams in the United States and Taiwan. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031908
Hüffmeier, J., Zerres, A., Freund, P. A., Backhaus, K., Trötschel, R., & Hertel, G. (2018a). Strong or Weak Synergy ? Revising the Assumption of Team-Related Advantages in Integrative Negotiations. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2721–2750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318770245
Hüffmeier, J., Zerres, A., Freund, P. A., Backhaus, K., Trötschel, R., & Hertel, G. (2018b). Strong or Weak Synergy? Revising the Assumption of Team-Related Advantages in Integrative Negotiations. Journal of Management, XX(X), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318770245
Kersten, G., & Lai, H. (2010). Electronic negotiations: Foundations, systems, and processes. In Handbook of group decision and negotiation (pp. 361–392). Springer.
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in Teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347376
Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., Higgs, C., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 24–39.
Peleckis, K. (2014). International Business Negotiations: Innovation, Negotiation Team, Preparation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.848
Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F., & Shawn Burke, C. (2008). Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203889312
Schramm, F., & Morais, D. C. (2013). A bilateral and multi-issue negotiation framework to support a supply chain of construction industry. Pesquisa Operacional, 33(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382013005000008
Shafique, I., & Beh, L.-S. (2017). Shifting organizational leadership perspectives: An overview of leadership theories. Journal of Economic & Management Perspectives, 11(4), 134–143.
Thiemann, D., & Engelmann, T. (2015). Computer-supported preference awareness in negotiation teams for fostering accurate joint priorities. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 2015-Janua, 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2699013
Thiemann, D., Hesse, F. W., & Kozlov, M. (2019). The benefits of collaboration in computer-mediated preference exchange in teams: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.032
Vahidov, R., Kersten, G., & Saade, R. (2014). An experimental study of software agent negotiations with humans. Decision Support Systems, 66, 135–145.
Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Longer-term consequences of anger expression in negotiation: Retaliation or spillover? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 753–760.
Voeth, M., & Lenzing, A. C. (2017). Renegotiations – empirical analysis of impacts on business relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 32(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-09-2015-0175
Wilken, R., Jacob, F., & Prime, N. (2013). The ambiguous role of cultural moderators in intercultural business negotiations. International Business Review, 22(4), 736–753.
Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451–483.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. Wamuyu Mahinda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
