The Role of Instructors Support and Feedback on the Performance of Online and Distance Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijodl.2001Keywords:
Instructors' Support, Feedback Provision, Performance, Online Learning, Distance Learning, Academic AchievementAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning. Preliminary empirical review revealed that there is need for instructors to prioritize personalized support, timely feedback, and active engagement with learners to foster a supportive and engaging learning environment.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Presence Theory, Self-Determination Theory and the Transactional Distance Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning. Instructors should establish clear communication channels and responsive feedback mechanisms to facilitate ongoing interaction with learners. Instructors should provide constructive and personalized feedback that focuses on both strengths and areas for improvement. Instructors should actively foster a sense of community and social presence in online and distance learning environments. Lastly, professional development and training programs should be offered to instructors to enhance their pedagogical skills in online and distance learning
Downloads
References
A. B., & Johnson, C. D. (2018). The impact of instructor support and feedback on student performance in online courses. Online Learning Journal, 22(3), 120-135. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v22i3.1143
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2019). Digital Learning Compass: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 15(4), 1-13. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol15no4/Allen_0919.pdf
Anderson, L., & Rourke, L. (2018). Exploring the relationship between instructor support, feedback, and student engagement in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 29. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-018-0117-
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Artino, A. R., et al. (2012). Exploring cognitive and motivational effects of peer tutoring in online learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(2), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2012.665755
Babson Survey Research Group. (2020). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Blended Learning and Technology Use in Higher Education: From the General to the Applied. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(2), 118-142. doi:10.1080/08923647.2014.895272
Brown, S., et al. (2017). The role of instructor support and feedback in promoting student motivation and satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 13(4), 100-118. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol13no4/brown_1217.pdf
Communications Authority of Kenya. (2021). Kenya ICT market performance report, Q3 2020/2021. Retrieved from https://ca.go.ke/images/Reports/2021/Kenya_ICT_Market_Performance_Quarterly_Sector_Statistics_Report_Q3_2020_2021.pdf
Coursera. (2020). About Coursera. Retrieved from https://www.coursera.org/about
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Department for Education. (2018). Realising the potential of technology in education: A strategy for education providers and the technology industry. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/realising-the-potential-of-technology-in-education
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (2013). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.785584
Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2020). Higher Education Student Statistics: UK, 2019/20. Retrieved from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/whos-in-he/where-from
Johnson, M. K., et al. (2019). Instructor feedback strategies and learner engagement in massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 89-107. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v20i3.3941
Kim, D., & Chung, S. (2017). The impact of instructor feedback on perceived learning and self-efficacy in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 186-205. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2697
KPMG. (2017). Online education in India: 2021 market size, trends, and forecast. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg/in/en/home/insights/2017/11/online-education-india-market-size.html
Kusurkar, R. A., et al. (2013). Motivation in medical students: A complex socio-contextual issue. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(5), 753-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9384-1
Lee, S., & Johnson, J. (2016). Instructor support and feedback in blended learning: Student perspectives and recommendations. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 15(1), 16-30. Retrieved from https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/15.1.2.pdf
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2019). White Paper on Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology 2019. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/highered/title02/detail02/1373830.htm
Moore, J. L., & Cropper, S. (2018). Feedback on student writing: The challenge of mediating between formative and evaluative feedback. Distance Education, 39(2), 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1457851
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Enrollment and Employees in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2018; and Financial Statistics and Academic Libraries, Fiscal Year 2018: First Look (Provisional Data). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020004.pdf
Oketch, M., & Ngware, M. (2017). Trends in virtual learning: A review of research in e-learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 160-167. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1158399.pdf
Okojie-Mai, M. (2016). Reaching learners through online and blended learning: The African Virtual University example. In R. Luckin (Ed.), Enhancing learning and teaching with technology: What the research says (pp. 189-203). British Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1150095
Open University of Japan. (2020). Open University of Japan Annual Report 2019. Retrieved from https://www.ouj.ac.jp/english/about/annual_report/
Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C. K., & Hanson, D. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on learning-the perspective of the Ghanaian student. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(3), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3764867
Shea, P., et al. (2014). The effects of online learning on students' perceived satisfaction, learning, and engagement in a leadership course. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(1), 52-67. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, J., & Johnson, A. (2019). Trends and challenges in online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1566072
Suzuki, K., & Okamoto, T. (2017). Trend Analysis of Distance Education in Japan Using Big Data. Journal of Open and Distance Learning Research, 24(1), 45-54. doi:10.5057/jodlr.24.1_45
Taylor, J. C. (2015). Open and distance education in Brazil: The Brazilian Open University (UAB). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2305
The Open University. (2020). The OU in 2019/20: The Facts and Figures. Retrieved from https://www.open.ac.uk/about/main/strategy-and-policies/ou-publications/annual-report-and-accounts/the-ou-in-2019-20-the-facts-and-figures
Wang, Y., & Chen, B. (2020). Effects of instructor feedback timing on learner performance in online courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103787. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787
World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Learning to realize education's promise. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nelson Weru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
