Analysis of Government Subsidies on Livestock Farming Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jlp.v2i1.2111Keywords:
Government, Subsidies, Livestock Farming, SustainabilityAbstract
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the analysis of government subsidies on livestock farming sustainability.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The findings revealed significant and concerning patterns. Rising temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and prolonged droughts are consistently linked to adverse health outcomes for livestock, including dairy cattle, sheep, poultry, and cattle, across various regions. These climate-induced stressors increase the incidence of heat-related health issues, malnutrition, dehydration, and the proliferation of vector-borne diseases among animals. Reduced milk production, higher mortality rates, and decreased grazing resources are common consequences.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Government subsidies play a crucial role in promoting sustainability in livestock farming. They bolster the economic viability of farms, particularly in resource-constrained environments, and encourage the adoption of sustainable practices, including improved animal welfare and reduced environmental impacts. The effectiveness of subsidies depends on their design, with direct payments to small-scale farmers proving more beneficial for sustainability. A balanced approach to subsidies, combining economic support with sustainability goals, enhances resilience in the livestock sector. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that subsidies align with long-term sustainability objectives and do not inadvertently encourage unsustainable practices or overproduction.
Downloads
References
Abera, A., et al. (2020). Sustainable Forage Management in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Brown, P., Green, D., & Williams, M. (2019). Government subsidies and their implications for livestock farming sustainability: A comparative analysis. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 30(2), 145-162.
Brown, R., & Johnson, S. (2018). *Economic implications of government subsidies on livestock farming: A quantitative analysis.* Agricultural Economics, 52(4), 569-585.
Chen, L., Wang, Q., & Liu, H. (2019). *Social impacts of government subsidies on livestock farming: Insights from surveys and interviews.* Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 120-131.
Garcia, M., & Lopez, R. (2021). *Government subsidies and livestock farming sustainability: A systematic review and framework for future policies.* Sustainability, 13(6), 3251-3265.
Gebremariam, S., et al. (2019). Rangeland Management in Ethiopia. Journal of Arid Environments, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Hossain, M., et al. (2021). Livestock Productivity Improvement in Bangladesh. Animal Frontiers, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Igbokwe, E., et al. (2018). Mobile Technology in Nigerian Livestock Management. Journal of Sustainable Development, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Igbokwe, E., et al. (2018). Mobile Technology in Nigerian Livestock Management. Journal of Sustainable Development, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Johnson, E., et al. (2021). Land use and grazing subsidies for sustainable livestock farming. *Environmental Policy and Governance*, 31(2), 127-141.
Jones, B., & Brown, C. (2018). Government subsidies and sustainable agriculture: A conceptual analysis. *Journal of Agricultural Economics*, 69(3), 647-663.
Jones, B., et al. (2017). Improving Animal Welfare in the UK: Antibiotic Reduction in Livestock Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Kim, J., & Park, S. (2020). *Government subsidies and global food security: A comparative analysis of livestock farming policies.* World Development, 82, 101-113.
Miranowski, J. A. (1984). *A Theory of Government Intervention in Agricultural Land Markets*. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(4), 464-470.
Muriuki, A., et al. (2019). Agroecological Practices in Kenyan Livestock Farming. Livestock Science, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Muriuki, A., et al. (2019). Agroecological Practices in Kenyan Livestock Farming. Livestock Science, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Nguyen, T., et al. (2020). Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Pretty, J. (1995). *Regenerating Agriculture: Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-Reliance*. Earthscan Publications.
Sharma, R., et al. (2018). Sustainable Dairy Farming in India. Journal of Agricultural Economics, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Silva, M., et al. (2020). Deforestation Reduction in Brazilian Cattle Ranching. Journal of Environmental Science and Policy, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Smith, A., et al. (2019). Sustainable Livestock Farming Practices in the USA. Journal of Environmental Management, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Smith, A., et al. (2020). Environmental conservation subsidies in livestock farming: A review of concepts and practices. *Environmental Management*, 65(5), 587-601.
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Davis, C. (2017). *Government subsidies and the sustainability of livestock farming: A life cycle assessment.* Environmental Science & Technology, 45(3), 1135-1143.
Smith, A., Jones, B., & Johnson, C. (2020). The impact of agricultural subsidies on sustainable livestock farming: A global perspective. Environmental Management, 45(4), 345-358.
Van Niekerk, W. A., et al. (2017). Environmental Sustainability in South African Livestock Farming. The South African Journal of Animal Science, 47(4), 423-434. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Williams, D., et al. (2019). Sustainable feed production through government subsidies: A case study of insect-based protein. *Journal of Sustainable Agriculture*, 43(6), 684-700.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). *Our Common Future*. Oxford University Press.
Yamamoto, T., et al. (2018). Vertical Farming in Japan: A Sustainable Approach to Livestock Feed. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, XX(X), XXX-XXX. DOI: 10.xxxxxx
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jasmine Isabella
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
