Contribution of Livestock Farming to Environmental Pollution in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/jah.2510Keywords:
Contribution, Livestock Farming, Environmental PollutionAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to examine contribution of livestock farming to environmental pollution in China.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study found that livestock farming in China significantly contributes to environmental pollution, posing substantial challenges to water, air, and soil quality. Intensive livestock operations, characterized by concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), generate large quantities of animal waste containing nutrients and pathogens that contaminate water bodies. Additionally, livestock farming contributes to air pollution through emissions of ammonia and other pollutants, particularly in areas with intensive farming practices. Soil degradation and nutrient imbalance further exacerbate environmental degradation, with higher livestock densities associated with increased soil compaction and nutrient runoff.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Tragedy of the Commons & Ecological Modernization Theory may be used to anchor future studies on contribution of livestock farming to environmental pollution in China. Promote the adoption of sustainable livestock management practices through capacity building, training, and extension services for farmers. Encourage the implementation of integrated farming systems that optimize resource use, minimize waste generation, and enhance environmental resilience. Strengthen regulatory frameworks and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with environmental standards and promote responsible livestock production. Implement stringent measures to control water pollution from livestock waste, including mandatory wastewater treatment and monitoring programs.
Downloads
References
Cambra-López, M., Aarnink, A. J., Zhao, Y., & Calvet, S. (2010). Airborne particulate matter from livestock production systems: A review of an air pollution problem. Environmental Pollution, 158(1), 1-17.
Cerdà, A., & Pulido, M. (2015). The effect of livestock on soil properties and soil erosion in temperate Mediterranean areas by means of soil surveys. Catena, 128, 172-182.
DEFRA. (2020). UK Statistics on Waste. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/895045/UK_Statistics_on_Waste_statistical_notice_March_2020_rev_FINAL_FINAL.pdf
Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). National summary of state information: 2016 reporting year. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-06/documents/national-summary-of-state-information-2016-reporting-year.pdf
Eshel, G., Shepon, A., Makov, T., & Milo, R. (2014). Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(33), 11996-12001.
García-González, M. C., Masaguer, A., Moliner, A., & Navarro-Pedreño, J. (2021). Impacts of livestock farming on soil and water quality: A review. Animals, 11(1), 236.
Garg, A., & Kaushik, S. (2018). Ambient air quality, vehicular pollution and the role of industries: A review. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control, 34(2), 349-364.
Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., ... & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., ... & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-1248. Top of Form
He, L. Y., Liu, Y. S., Su, H. C., Zhao, J. L., Liu, S. S., Chen, J., ... & Ying, G. G. (2014). Dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in representative broiler feedlots environments: Identification of indicator ARGs and correlations with environmental variables. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(22), 13120-13129.
Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M. C., Thornton, P. K., ... & Obersteiner, M. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52), 20888-20893.
Hilson, G., & Nayee, N. (2016). Mining-induced displacement and resettlement: A critical appraisal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(1), 357-365.
INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. (2020). PRODES - Monitoring of the Brazilian Amazon Deforestation. Retrieved from http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes
Iwamoto, Y., Tagawa, A., Kuroiwa, T., & Sato, Y. (2017). Status of heavy metal pollution in rivers and sediments of Japan and its implications for drinking water safety. Water, 9(3), 171.
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science Advances, 1(10), e1500.
Kovats, R. S., Bouma, M. J., & Haines, A. (2017). Livestock farming and water quality in peri-urban areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(3), 036001.
Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17-49.
Obiomah, C. M., Eze, C. L., & Mmom, P. C. (2016). The impact of oil spillage on the environment of the Niger Delta region, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(1), 2250-3153.
Ogundipe, A. A., & Aderonmu, P. A. (2017). Assessment of solid waste management in Ibadan, Nigeria. Environmental Quality Management, 26(3), 59-67.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Thanner, S., Drissner, D., & Walsh, F. (2016). Antimicrobial resistance in agriculture. MBio, 7(2), e02227-15.
Thornton, P. K., Boone, R. B., & Ramirez-Villegas, J. (2018). Climate change impacts on livestock. CCAFS Working Paper no. 261. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).
UK Government. (2019). Clean Air Strategy 2019. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/770715/clean-air-strategy-2019.pdf
UN Environment. (2019). Global Waste Management Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/global-waste-management-outlook
Wang, L., Tang, J., Xu, C., Guo, X., & Wang, G. (2018). Impact of intensive livestock farming on water quality: A case study in rural China. Environmental Pollution, 238, 786-795.
Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Modak, P., Soos, R., Carpintero, Ó., Velis, C. A., & Masterson, D. (2019). Global waste management outlook. United Nations Environment Programme.
World Bank. (2019). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317
ZEMA - Zambia Environmental Management Agency. (2018). Zambia State of Environment Outlook Report 2017. Retrieved from https://www.zema.org.zm/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Zambia-SoE-Report-2017.pdf
Zhang, T. Q., Zhang, J. H., & Li, Y. H. (2016). Effects of different manure management practices on runoff water quality in a small watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Ecological Engineering, 95, 589-597.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chief Editor; John Williams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
