Virtual Empathy: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Digital Communication on Interpersonal Relationships and Social Dynamics

Authors

  • Elvira Čekić University of Sarajevo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ijp.3320

Keywords:

Virtual Empathy, Digital Communication, Artificial Intelligence, Social Relationships, Cognitive and Affective Empathy.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to determine how virtual empathy, as a multidimensional psychological construct, manifests within digitally mediated interactions and to examine its impact on emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, and patterns of social connectedness. The analysis encompasses both cognitive and affective components of empathy, their variations depending on communication modalities, as well as empathy-related dysfunctions conditioned by technological factors. The review also includes studies that investigate the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Reality (VR) in the modulation of emotional processes, moral evaluation, and neurocognitive sensitivity within digital contexts.

Methodology: This systematic review includes the analysis of 42 empirical studies published between 2013 and 2024, identified through a structured search of major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. A qualitative content analysis was used to synthesize key findings, with a focus on psychological and neurocognitive mechanisms relevant to the phenomenon of virtual empathy. The selected studies span various research designs, experimental, longitudinal, survey-based, and meta-analytic, and examine digital mechanisms such as emojis, avatars, algorithmic content personalization, and interactive AI-based systems. The analytical approach is oriented toward identifying how digital environments compensate for the absence of nonverbal cues and mediate empathic processes through symbolic and immersive technologies.

Findings: The systematic review suggests that virtual empathy has a significant impact on emotional regulation and the quality of interpersonal relationships in digital contexts. Digital platforms, especially those utilizing Virtual Reality (VR), can facilitate the development of cognitive and affective empathy, particularly when the content stimulates perspective-taking and emotional resonance. However, specific limitations of digital communication, including the absence of nonverbal cues, emotional superficiality, and the dominance of algorithmically shaped “echo chambers,” may substantially reduce the authenticity of empathic responses. Furthermore, chronic exposure to digitally mediated content may lead to gradual desensitization to others’ emotions, potentially impairing moral sensitivity and eroding social cohesion.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: This review advances theoretical understanding through the synthesis of classical frameworks, such as Social Presence Theory and Media Richness Theory, with emerging constructs like simulated affectivity and algorithmic mediation, offering an enhanced model of digital empathy. It provides insights into how virtual environments shape moral reasoning, emotional regulation, and prosocial behavior. It provides insights into how virtual environments shape moral reasoning, emotional regulation, and prosocial behavior. At the practical level, it offers recommendations for the design of emotionally intelligent digital tools and educational programs aimed at preventing empathic desensitization. At the policy level, it highlights the need for ethical standards to regulate algorithmic content and promote inclusive, emotionally authentic communication. It also opens avenues for interdisciplinary research into the psychological implications of contemporary technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-Alrazaq, A.A., Rababeh, A., Alajlani, M., Bewick, B.M., Househ, M. (2020).

Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res, 22(7). https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e16021/

Canet, F., Sánchez-Castillo., S. (2024). Understanding How Immersive Media Enhance Prosociality: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Communication Research, 1-20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380382854_Understanding_How_Immersive_Media_Enhance_Prosociality_A_Systematic_Literature_Review_and_Meta-Analysis

Carrier, L.M., Spradlin, A., Bunce, J.P. & Rosen, L.D. (2015). Virtual Empathy: Positive and Negative Impacts of Going Online upon Empathy in Young Adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 39-48.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.026 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563215003970?via%3Dihubh

Chen, V. H. H., & Ibasco, G. C. (2023). All it takes is empathy: how virtual reality perspective-taking influences intergroup attitudes and stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, Sec. Media Psychology, 14. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265284/full

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227445746_Organizational_Information_Requirements_Media_Richness_and_Structural_Design

Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51369194_The_Functional_Architecture_of_Human_Empathy

Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563207000866

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.

Giles, R. M., Byrd, K. O., Ferguson, S., & Vitulli, P. (2024). Online Learning Post-COVID: Faculty Caring in the Eyes of University Students. Higher Education Forum. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1421790.pdf

Gitto-Kania, Tami C. (2023). Fostering Empathy in SMS Text Messaging. Graduate Thesis and Dissertation 2023-2024. University of Central Florida. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=etd2023

Ellis, L. A., Campbell, A. J., & Sethi, S. (2011). Comparative randomized trial of an online cognitive-behavioral therapy program and an online support group for depression and anxiety. Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, 4(4):461-467. https://psychologicalsciences.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/3522579/Santamaria-2011.pdf#page=39

Ickes, W. (1997). Emphatic Accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/Empathic_Accuracy.pdf

López-Faican, L., Jaen, J., Montaner, J. (2024). Exploring Augmented Reality in Multiplayer Game Design to Promote Empathy and Prosocial Behavior. Computer Interaction Research,10(1-8). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3612783.3612794

Li, H., Zhang, R. (2024). Finding Love in Algorithms: Deciphering the Emotional Contexts of Close Encounters with AI Chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5). https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/29/5/zmae015/7742812

Lozada, F.T., & Tynes, B.M. (2017). Longitudinal effects of online experiences on empathy among African American adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,52:181-190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0193397316302180

Terren, L., & Borge-Bravo, T. (2021). Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research Journal, 9:99-118. https://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/rcr/article/view/16/16

Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3391293

Modak, A., & Nath, A. (2024). Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of multidisciplinary research, 2(8):266-270. https://theacademic.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/30-1.pdf

Tang, Y., Hew, K.F. (2019). Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings. International Journal of Communication, 13:2457–2483. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/10966/2670

Thompson, N.M., van Reekum, C.M,, Chakrabarti, B. (2022). Cognitive and Affective Empathy Relate Differentially to Emotion Regulation. Affect Sci. 3(1):118-134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989800/

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Seitz, L. (2024). Artificial empathy in healthcare chatbots: Does it feel authentic? Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2, (1). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000276

Place, S., Blanch-Hartigan, D., Rubin., C, Gorrostieta, C., Mead, C., Kane, J., Marx, B.P., Feast, J, Deckersbach T, Pentland A, Nierenberg A, Azarbayejani A. (2017).

Behavioral Indicators on a Mobile Sensing Platform Predict Clinically Validated Psychiatric Symptoms of Mood and Anxiety Disorders

J Med Internet Res,19(3):e75. https://www.jmir.org/2017/3/e75/

Powell, P. A., & Roberts, J. (2017). Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions. Computers in Human Behavior,68:137-148. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321630766X#sec2

Walther, J.B., D'addario, K.P. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3):324-347. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089443930101900307 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228603465_The_Impacts_of_Emoticons_on_Message_Interpretation_in_Computer-Mediated_Communication

Downloads

Published

2025-05-05

How to Cite

Čekić, E. (2025). Virtual Empathy: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Digital Communication on Interpersonal Relationships and Social Dynamics. International Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijp.3320

Issue

Section

Articles