Virtual Empathy: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Digital Communication on Interpersonal Relationships and Social Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijp.3320Keywords:
Virtual Empathy, Digital Communication, Artificial Intelligence, Social Relationships, Cognitive and Affective Empathy.Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to determine how virtual empathy, as a multidimensional psychological construct, manifests within digitally mediated interactions and to examine its impact on emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, and patterns of social connectedness. The analysis encompasses both cognitive and affective components of empathy, their variations depending on communication modalities, as well as empathy-related dysfunctions conditioned by technological factors. The review also includes studies that investigate the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Virtual Reality (VR) in the modulation of emotional processes, moral evaluation, and neurocognitive sensitivity within digital contexts.
Methodology: This systematic review includes the analysis of 42 empirical studies published between 2013 and 2024, identified through a structured search of major scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar. A qualitative content analysis was used to synthesize key findings, with a focus on psychological and neurocognitive mechanisms relevant to the phenomenon of virtual empathy. The selected studies span various research designs, experimental, longitudinal, survey-based, and meta-analytic, and examine digital mechanisms such as emojis, avatars, algorithmic content personalization, and interactive AI-based systems. The analytical approach is oriented toward identifying how digital environments compensate for the absence of nonverbal cues and mediate empathic processes through symbolic and immersive technologies.
Findings: The systematic review suggests that virtual empathy has a significant impact on emotional regulation and the quality of interpersonal relationships in digital contexts. Digital platforms, especially those utilizing Virtual Reality (VR), can facilitate the development of cognitive and affective empathy, particularly when the content stimulates perspective-taking and emotional resonance. However, specific limitations of digital communication, including the absence of nonverbal cues, emotional superficiality, and the dominance of algorithmically shaped “echo chambers,” may substantially reduce the authenticity of empathic responses. Furthermore, chronic exposure to digitally mediated content may lead to gradual desensitization to others’ emotions, potentially impairing moral sensitivity and eroding social cohesion.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: This review advances theoretical understanding through the synthesis of classical frameworks, such as Social Presence Theory and Media Richness Theory, with emerging constructs like simulated affectivity and algorithmic mediation, offering an enhanced model of digital empathy. It provides insights into how virtual environments shape moral reasoning, emotional regulation, and prosocial behavior. It provides insights into how virtual environments shape moral reasoning, emotional regulation, and prosocial behavior. At the practical level, it offers recommendations for the design of emotionally intelligent digital tools and educational programs aimed at preventing empathic desensitization. At the policy level, it highlights the need for ethical standards to regulate algorithmic content and promote inclusive, emotionally authentic communication. It also opens avenues for interdisciplinary research into the psychological implications of contemporary technologies.
Downloads
References
Abd-Alrazaq, A.A., Rababeh, A., Alajlani, M., Bewick, B.M., Househ, M. (2020).
Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res, 22(7). https://www.jmir.org/2020/7/e16021/
Canet, F., Sánchez-Castillo., S. (2024). Understanding How Immersive Media Enhance Prosociality: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Communication Research, 1-20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380382854_Understanding_How_Immersive_Media_Enhance_Prosociality_A_Systematic_Literature_Review_and_Meta-Analysis
Carrier, L.M., Spradlin, A., Bunce, J.P. & Rosen, L.D. (2015). Virtual Empathy: Positive and Negative Impacts of Going Online upon Empathy in Young Adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 39-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.026 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563215003970?via%3Dihubh
Chen, V. H. H., & Ibasco, G. C. (2023). All it takes is empathy: how virtual reality perspective-taking influences intergroup attitudes and stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, Sec. Media Psychology, 14. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265284/full
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227445746_Organizational_Information_Requirements_Media_Richness_and_Structural_Design
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71–100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51369194_The_Functional_Architecture_of_Human_Empathy
Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563207000866
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.
Giles, R. M., Byrd, K. O., Ferguson, S., & Vitulli, P. (2024). Online Learning Post-COVID: Faculty Caring in the Eyes of University Students. Higher Education Forum. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1421790.pdf
Gitto-Kania, Tami C. (2023). Fostering Empathy in SMS Text Messaging. Graduate Thesis and Dissertation 2023-2024. University of Central Florida. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1094&context=etd2023
Ellis, L. A., Campbell, A. J., & Sethi, S. (2011). Comparative randomized trial of an online cognitive-behavioral therapy program and an online support group for depression and anxiety. Journal of Cyber Therapy and Rehabilitation, 4(4):461-467. https://psychologicalsciences.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/3522579/Santamaria-2011.pdf#page=39
Ickes, W. (1997). Emphatic Accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/images/uploads/Empathic_Accuracy.pdf
López-Faican, L., Jaen, J., Montaner, J. (2024). Exploring Augmented Reality in Multiplayer Game Design to Promote Empathy and Prosocial Behavior. Computer Interaction Research,10(1-8). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3612783.3612794
Li, H., Zhang, R. (2024). Finding Love in Algorithms: Deciphering the Emotional Contexts of Close Encounters with AI Chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(5). https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/29/5/zmae015/7742812
Lozada, F.T., & Tynes, B.M. (2017). Longitudinal effects of online experiences on empathy among African American adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,52:181-190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0193397316302180
Terren, L., & Borge-Bravo, T. (2021). Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research Journal, 9:99-118. https://www.rcommunicationr.org/index.php/rcr/article/view/16/16
Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3391293
Modak, A., & Nath, A. (2024). Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of multidisciplinary research, 2(8):266-270. https://theacademic.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/30-1.pdf
Tang, Y., Hew, K.F. (2019). Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings. International Journal of Communication, 13:2457–2483. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/10966/2670
Thompson, N.M., van Reekum, C.M,, Chakrabarti, B. (2022). Cognitive and Affective Empathy Relate Differentially to Emotion Regulation. Affect Sci. 3(1):118-134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989800/
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Seitz, L. (2024). Artificial empathy in healthcare chatbots: Does it feel authentic? Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2, (1). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000276
Place, S., Blanch-Hartigan, D., Rubin., C, Gorrostieta, C., Mead, C., Kane, J., Marx, B.P., Feast, J, Deckersbach T, Pentland A, Nierenberg A, Azarbayejani A. (2017).
Behavioral Indicators on a Mobile Sensing Platform Predict Clinically Validated Psychiatric Symptoms of Mood and Anxiety Disorders
J Med Internet Res,19(3):e75. https://www.jmir.org/2017/3/e75/
Powell, P. A., & Roberts, J. (2017). Situational determinants of cognitive, affective, and compassionate empathy in naturalistic digital interactions. Computers in Human Behavior,68:137-148. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321630766X#sec2
Walther, J.B., D'addario, K.P. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3):324-347. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/089443930101900307 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228603465_The_Impacts_of_Emoticons_on_Message_Interpretation_in_Computer-Mediated_Communication
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elvira Čekić

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.