Comparative Analysis of Environmental Protection Laws and Their Impact on Sustainable Development in Rwanda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlp.2706Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze comparative analysis of environmental protection laws and their impact on sustainable development in Rwanda.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Environmental protection laws play a crucial role in sustainable development, particularly in Rwanda where the balance between economic growth and environmental integrity is pivotal. A comparative analysis reveals that systematic inclusion of environmental impact assessments and strategic environmental assessments are essential for fostering sustainable development. These processes ensure that environmental considerations are integrated into the planning and decision-making stages of development projects, thereby mitigating negative impacts on the environment. Capacity building at various levels, from macro to micro, is recommended to enhance the understanding and implementation of these laws.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Legal pluralism, policy diffusion & institutional analysis may be used to anchor future studies on comparative analysis of environmental protection laws and their impact on sustainable development in Rwanda. Practitioners can leverage findings from such studies to identify best practices, lessons learned, and areas for improvement in environmental governance. Policymakers should use comparative analysis findings to inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of environmental policies and regulations at local, national, and global levels.
Downloads
References
Assunção, J., Gandour, C., & Rocha, R. (2017). Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: Prices or policies? Environment and Development Economics, 22(6), 634-657. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X16000137
Bass, S., Dalal-Clayton, B., & Pretty, J. (2019). Reducing poverty through forest landscape restoration: A guide to assessing costs and benefits. Routledge.
Brunnee, J., & Toope, S. J. (2010). Legitimacy and legality in international law: An interactional account. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, L., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2019). Comparative analysis of land use planning laws and policies in China and the United States: A case study approach. Land Use Policy, 81, 140-150.
Cocoa and Forests Initiative. (2017). Ghana Cocoa Forest REDD+ Program. https://www.cocoaforests.org/publication/ghana-cocoa-forests-redd-program
Committee on Climate Change. (2020). Reducing UK emissions: 2020 Progress Report to Parliament. https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/reducing-uk-emissions-2020-progress-report-to-parliament/
Craig, R. K. (2017). A pragmatic legal perspective on environmental federalism. In Federalism and the Making of America (pp. 101-115). Routledge.
Cullet, P. (2012). Linkages between biodiversity and climate change: Implications for the law. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(2), 167-177.
Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, South Africa. (2019). Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) 2019. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201911/irdp-2019-executive-summary.pdf
Department of Water and Sanitation, South Africa. (2017). National Water and Sanitation Master Plan. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201907/national-water-and-sanitation-master-plan_0.pdf
Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany. (2020). Energy Data: Figures and Charts. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Dossier/energy-data.html
Federal Ministry of Environment, Nigeria. (n.d.). Nigeria's Protected Areas. https://environment.gov.ng/our-services/national-parks-and-protected-areas/
Federal Ministry of Works and Housing, Nigeria. (2012). National Urban Development Policy. https://www.works.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/National-Urban-Development-Policy.pdf
Forestry Commission of Ghana. (2016). Ghana's National REDD+ Strategy. https://www.fcghana.org/files/REDD+National%20Strategy%20Final.pdf
Garcia, J., & Martinez, A. (2020). Comparative analysis of waste management laws and practices in European countries: Implications for sustainable development. Waste Management & Research, 38(5), 485-498.
Government of India. (2008). National Action Plan on Climate Change. http://moef.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/national-action-plan-on-climate-change.pdf
Government of Kenya. (2019). Kenya's National Climate Change Action Plan 2018-2022. https://climatechange.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/NCCAP-Final-Version-29th-Nov.pdf
Gray, K. R. (2002). Environmental regulation and competitive advantage. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Griffiths, J. (2019). Legal pluralism. In D. Farrier & P. Stein (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd ed., pp. 247-268). Oxford University Press.
Guruswamy, L. D. (2014). Environmental law: Text, cases & materials. LexisNexis UK.
Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. D., & Nelson, P. (2018). The effectiveness of US environmental regulation. Oxford University Press.
Heller, N. E., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2009). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation, 142(1), 14-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.006
INPE - National Institute for Space Research. (2020). Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia. http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes
Jones, A., & Brown, R. (2018). A comparative analysis of water pollution control laws in developing countries: A case study of Ghana and Nigeria. Environmental Development, 25, 76-86
Karkkainen, B. C. (2015). Reflections on comparative environmental law scholarship: Mapping theterrain, looking ahead. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 28(2), 157-181.
Kim, S., Lee, K., & Park, J. (2018). Comparative analysis of air quality regulations and public health outcomes in Asian countries: Implications for sustainable urban development. Environmental Science & Policy, 88, 87-95.
Kok, M., Patel, M. K., & Rothuizen, J. (2008). Sustainability in the Netherlands: Poldering in a Polder Country. Sustainability, 1(2), 92-109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1020092
Ministry of Agriculture, Tanzania. (2013). Tanzania National Agriculture Policy. https://www.agriculture.go.tz/uploads/2017/12/National_Agriculture_Policy_Final_4-1.pdf
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan. (2020). Annual Report on Energy. https://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/electric_power_statistics.html
Ministry of Energy, Ghana. (2019). Ghana Renewable Energy Master Plan. https://energymin.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GHANA-RENEWABLE-ENERGY-MASTER-PLAN-2019_FINAL.pdf
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Ethiopia. (2011). Climate-Resilient Green Economy Strategy. http://www.ethioclimate.org.et/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/CRGE-Strategy.pdf
Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, Netherlands. (2020). Cycling in the Netherlands. https://www.government.nl/topics/cycling/cycling-in-the-netherlands
Ministry of the Environment, Japan. (2020). Waste Management and Recycling in Japan. https://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste_management/index.html
Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Energy, Ethiopia. (2020). Ethiopia's Renewable Energy Development Plan. https://www.mowie.gov.et/web/guest/national-energy-policy-and-strategy/-/asset_publisher/9HwJvQOaSp9w/content/ethiopia-s-renewable-energy-development-plan?inheritRedirect=false
Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette, B., ... & Boyd, W. (2006). Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00351.x
Osofsky, H. M., & Bratspies, R. M. (2011). Climate change, sustainable development, and international law: Rebuilding the bridge. Environmental Law Reporter, 41(3), 10054-10065.
Ostrom, E. (2018). Institutional analysis and development: Elements of the framework in historical perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(2), 245-261.
Republic of Rwanda. (2016). Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/10.3rd%20NATCOM%20English%20Version_0.pdf
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2018). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 23-32.
Smith, J., Johnson, M., & Lee, R. (2017). Environmental regulations and sustainable development: A cross-national analysis. Ecological Economics, 131, 139-151.
Swedish Energy Agency. (2020). Energy in Sweden. https://www.energimyndigheten.se/en/energy-in-sweden/
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2018). Sweden's Protected Areas: Key Figures 2018. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer6400/978-91-620-8798-9.pdf
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). National Inventory Report Sweden 2020. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer6400/978-91-620-8924-2.pdf
Tanzania National Parks Authority. (n.d.). Protected Areas in Tanzania. https://www.tanzaniaparks.go.tz/index.php/parks
Tietenberg, T. H., & Lewis, L. (2018). Environmental and natural resource economics. Routledge.
Umkehrer, M., Dengler, E., Harmsen, D., Kretschmer, B., Manegold, S., & Mayer, T. (2020). Germany's greenhouse gas emissions and climate targets. DIW Berlin. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.787303.de/diw_econ_bull_2020-38-3.pdf
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2015). The Emissions Gap Report 2015: A UNEP Synthesis Report. UNEP.
World Bank. (2019). Ethiopia Productive Safety Net Program. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/358731548823181482/pdf/Impact-Evaluation-of-Ethiopia-s-Productive-Safety-Net-Program-PSNP-Technical-Report.pdf
Wu, Y., Chen, L., & Li, X. (2021). Comparative analysis of environmental impact assessment laws in Latin American countries: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106617.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diane Mukankubana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
