Multi-Party Litigation in Tanzania: A Case for Class Action Suits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47604/ijlp.1863Keywords:
Multi-Party Litigation, Tanzania, Representative Suits, Class Action SuitsAbstract
Purpose: In suits involving numerous parties, legal technicalities are involved. Such suits call for special litigation devices. Multiparty litigation devices in Tanzania can take different forms such as joinder, next of kin, representative suits and class action suits. However, representative suit is currently the main means of handling claims for compensation involving large groups of similarly affected victims.
Methodology: This study carries out an appraisal of the legal framework in Tanzania concerning multiparty litigation devices. It is shown that too strict an adherence to same interest and locus standi requirements in Tanzania makes multiparty litigation devices too restrictive. In addition, multiparty litigation devices for group actions are not clearly provided for.
Findings: Litigation devices have a great potential of helping parties to realize effective right to remedy. In order for litigation devices to effectively play that role, they should be friendly, timely and affordable. Similarly, such devices should be properly managed and clearly provided for under legislations.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Currently, a representative suit in Tanzania is interchangeably used both in public interest litigation and group action. In order to guarantee proper management of group actions, a case for class action rules is made. Indeed, a call for reform of the legal framework is recommended in this study to the effect that class action rules should be enacted in form of regulations or under a specific legislation.
Downloads
References
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, "Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa", Principle C (a), available at http://www.achpr.org/instruments/fair-trial/ (accessed 9th June, 2022).
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 9: The domestic application of the
Covenant, UN Doc E/C.12/1998/24, 3 December 1998, para 9.
Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law" UN Doc A/RES/60/147 (21 March 2006).
Gwynne Skinner, Robert McCorquodale and Olivier De Schutter, ""˜The Third Pillar: Access to Judicial Remedies for Human Rights Violations by Transnational Business", [2013] ICAR, CORE, ECCJ (December 2013), p. 30
International Humanitarian Law, UN Doc A/RES/60/147, 21 March 2006.
Principal 11, UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of
Principles 2(b), 3(c), 11(a), 12, 19, UN Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and
Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of
Reuters, "First claimants paid in South African silicosis settlement", https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-safrica-mining-silicosis-idUSKCN2AU1FX (accessed on 2nd September, 2021).
Sisanda Gerald Mfundisi, and Robert Parring, "United States: The Difficulties Of Class Action Claims In South Africa", 2019 at https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/class-actions/821906/the-difficulties-of-class-action-claims-in-south-africa (accessed on 2nd June, 2022)
The Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong, (n 51) 6.
The Law Reform Commission-Ireland, "Consultation paper on Multi-party Litigation (class actions)", (2003) (The Law Reform Commission, Consultation paper no. 25), at https://www.lawreform.ie/_fileupload/consultation%20papers/cp25.htm (accessed on 22nd July, 2020).
United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" Framework, United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, New York and Geneva, 2011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Naufal Kitonka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.