Environment Impact Assessments in developing economies
Keywords:
Environment, impact Assessments, developing economiesAbstract
Purpose: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is scientific and legal system for identifying and introducing measures to prevent environmental adverse impacts caused by development project. Developing countries have continuously and vigorously pursued economic growth; they have awakened to the fact that there is need for environmental compliance. This is evident in the numerous contemporary debates on various environmental issues and the increased awareness among the citizenry about environmental matters.
Conclusions: In Africa, many countries have instituted EIA regulations relatively recently. The adoption of EIAs in Africa is the result of a number of recent initiatives, including the 1995 African Ministerial Conference on Environment that committed African environment ministers to formalize the use of EIAs, an EIA stakeholders meeting in Nairobi in 1998, and the work of the Pan-African Initiative for Capacity Development and Linkages for EIA in Africa (CLEIAA).The Asian countries vary in terms of legislation, ranging from none to very recent and not widely applied legislation to extensive and robust EIA regulation set within a broader planning framework (Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea). Briffett asserts that many EIAs in the poorer Asian countries are of inadequate quality, with poor scoping, poor impact prediction, and limited public participation. This is largely attributed to the fact that most of these countries are preoccupied with economic growth, and EIAs are considered potential brakes on economic growth.
Policy Recommendations: This study provides implications for both policy and practice. This study recommends that developing countries should borrow a leaf from developed countries on EIA systems in their quest to attain sustainable development.Downloads
References
Abaza, H., Bisset, R., & Sadler, B. (2004). Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. UNEP/Earthprint.
Ahmad Balsam and Christopher Wood, 2002. A comparative evaluation of the EIA
systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Environ Impact Assess Rev 22, 213-234.
Briffett, C., Obbard, J. P., & Mackee, J. (2003). Towards SEA for the developing nations of Asia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(2), 171-196.
Declaration, R. (1992). Rio declaration on environment and development.
George, R. P. (1992). Natural law theory: contemporary essays.
Glasson, J., & Salvador, N. N. B. (2000). EIA in Brazil: a procedures–practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(2), 191-225.
Helm, B. W. (2002). Felt evaluations: A theory of pleasure and pain. American Philosophical Quarterly, 13-30.
Hirji, R., & Ortolano, L. (1991). Strategies for managing uncertainties imposed by environmental impact assessment analysis of a Kenyan river development authority. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 11(3), 203-230.
Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P., & Wood, C. (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental impact assessment review, 27(4), 287-300.
Kakonge, J. O. (2006). Environmental planning in Sub-Saharan Africa: Environmental impact assessment at the crossroads. Yale School of Foresty & Environmental Studies.
Kelsen, H. (1970). Pure theory of law. Univ of California Press.
Kibutu, T. N., & Mwenda, A. Provision for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Kenya’s legislation: A review of the Environmental Management & Coordination Act (EMCA) & the Environmental (Impact Assessment & Audit) Regulations (EIAAR).
Li, J. (2008). Environmental impact assessments in developing countries: An opportunity for greater environmental security. USAID FESS.
Maeda, A. (2003). Innovation in fuel cell technologies in Japan: Development and commercialization of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Retrieved on May, 20, 2005.
Perdicoúlis, A., & Glasson, J. (2006). Causal networks in EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(6), 553-569.
Read, P., & Fernandes, T. (2003). Management of environmental impacts of marine aquaculture in Europe. Aquaculture, 226(1), 139-163.
Rogerson, C. M. (2008, March). Tracking SMME development in South Africa: Issues of finance, training and the regulatory environment. In Urban Forum (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 61-81). Springer Netherlands.
Sadler, B., & McCabe, M. (2002). Environmental impact assessment training resource manual (Vol. 1). UNEP Division of Technology, Industry and Economics Economics and Trade Branch.
Stephens, G. L., & Graham, G. (2009). Mental illness and the consciousness thesis. The neuropsychology of mental illness, 390.
Telfer, T. C., & Beveridge, M. C. M. (2001). Monitoring environmental effects of marine fish aquaculture. Cahiers Options Mediterranennes, 55, 75-84.
Telfer, T. C., Atkin, H., & Corner, R. A. (2009). Review of environmental impact assessment and monitoring in aquaculture in Europe and North America. FAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper, (527).
Tye, M. (2006). The thesis of nonconceptual content. European Review of Philosophy, 6, 7-30.
Wood, C. (2003, November). Environmental impact assessment in developing countries: an overview. In Conference on New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice (pp. 24-25).
Wood, C. (2003, November). Environmental impact assessment in developing countries: an overview. In Conference on New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice (pp. 24-25).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
