REFORM INTERVENTIONS, PARTICIPATORY MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURAL PROJECTS FUNDED BY THE WORLD BANK IN TRANS-NZOIA COUNTY, KENYA
Keywords:
Participatory Monitoring, Financing Reform, Marketing Reform, Capacity Building Reform, Performance of Agricultural ProjectsAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the moderating influence of participatory monitoring on relationship between three reform interventions (marketing, financing and capacity building) on performance of Agricultural projects funded by World Bank in Trans-Nzoia County.
Methodology: The study adopted descriptive survey design using mixed mode approach. Target population of this study was 800 farmers and 15 project officials. The study sample size was 268 respondents determined using the simplified Yamane formula of proportions. Quantitative data was collected using a structured questionnaire with 60 Likert-type questions while qualitative data was collected using the standardized interview guide and focus group discussions. This study is grounded on pragmatism paradigm which complements the epistemological, methodological and axiological underpinnings desired in mixed methods research. The primary data was analyzed descriptively and inferentially using frequency distribution (mean, frequencies, percentages and standard deviation), stepwise regression and multiple regression analysis with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20.0.
Findings: The combined reform interventions explained 22.6% variation in the performance of agricultural projects. The coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.226 and adjusted R2 was 0.221 meaning combination of reforms jointly explained 22.1% of variation in project performance. On the introduction of moderator variable (participatory monitoring) through stepwise regression, the value of R2 increased from 0.221 (22.1%) to 0.5069 (50.69%), meaning participatory monitoring was responsible for 28.59% of variation in the performance of agricultural projects.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This study enriches the practice of participatory monitoring in project management and provides documented analysis and answers questions critical for credibility and utilization of participatory monitoring in programs. In terms of policy, considering that government of Kenya is working to develop systems to ensure development projects are delivered within confines of time, cost and client satisfaction, this study provides a pedestal upon which policy formulation on participatory processes can be anchored. The study therefore contributes immensely to the discipline of project management by providing the much-needed empirical data. This study will also support the re-engineering of project components such as layout and re-design processes by placing participatory approaches at core of project programming. The study provides quantifiable empirical evidence on the usefulness of participatory monitoring in pacifying the effects of poor project results hence enriching project management discipline.
Downloads
References
2) A. Kaul (2017): Demystifying" Concept of Participation" in Participatory M&E.
3) A. Shams (2017): Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Practice in Traditional Pakistan: Role and Practice of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, Karachi, Pakistan.
4) C.A McKim (2017): The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study-Journal of Mixed Methods Research.
5) D. Christopoulos and P. McAdam (2017): Do Financial Reforms help Stabilize Inequality? Journal of International Money and Finance,
6) F. Jessa and F.M Uys (2019): A systemic and Public Value Approach to Integrated Public Sector Reforms: A case for South African Municipalities, South Africa.
7) F. Onyilo,and A. Adong (2019): Agricultural Cooperative Marketing and Credit Policy Reform in Uganda: Opportunity for Poverty Reduction-Journal of Food, Agriculture & Nutrition, Kampala, Uganda.
8) Guijt I. (2019): Socio-Economic Methodologies for Natural Resources Research. Best Practice Guidelines for Participatory Monitoring & Evaluation Methodologies for Natural Resources.
9) H. Darani, M.R Kohansal & M. Ghorbani )2017): An Integrated Hydro-Economic Modeling to Evaluate Marketing Reform Policies of Agricultural Products
10) J. Schoonenboom, RB Johnson (2017): How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design
11) J. Bisena and R. Kumar (2018): Agricultural Marketing Reforms and e-National Agricultural Market (e-NAM), New Delhi, India.
12) K. Kusters, L. Buck, M. de Graaf, & P. Minang (2018): Participatory Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Multi-stakeholder Platforms in Integrated Landscape Initiatives. Sage Publications.
13) K. Kathuria, K. Singh and K.K Raina (2019): Agriculture Marketing Reforms in India, Relationship between Awareness and Attitude of Commission Agents in the APMC Reform. Punjab, India; Journal of Pharmacognosy.
14) L.A Ika and J. Donnelly (2017): Success Conditions for International Development Capacity Building Projects-in the International Journal of Project Management,
15) M. Baloch, A. Saeed, I. Ahmed, J. Oláh, J. Popp and D Máté (2018): The Role of Domestic Financial Reforms and the Internationalization of Non-Financial Transnational Firms: Evidence from Chinese Markets.
16) M. Hamdaoui and S. Maktouf (2020): Financial Reforms and Banking System Vulnerability: Role of Regulatory Frameworks-Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.
17) M. Reich, A.S Yazbeck, P. Berman and R. Bitran (2019): Lessons from the 20 years of Capacity Building for Health Systems Thinking.
18) M. Ojoyi (2017): Building Climate Resilience in Tanzania: Institutional Reform and Capacity Development
19) N. Rushford, D. Webster, L. Loiselle and P. Fehr (2016): Becoming Dementia- Friendly: Learning through Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation.
20) O. Otieno and J. Kennedy (2016): Perceived Effect of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation on the Local Authority Service Delivery Action Planning (LASDAP) process in Bondo Sub-County, Kenya.
21) P. Thapa, P. and Ngwenya, B. Kaufmann (2017): The Concept of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation; A tool for Making Farmer Groups Function Better-Appropriate Technology.
22) P. Shannon-Baker ( 2016): Making Paradigms Meaningful in Mixed Methods Research-Journal of Mixed Methods Research.
23) P. Bowles and G. White (2019): Political Economy of China's Financial Reforms: Finance in Late Development.
24) P.O Demetriades, P.L Rousseau (2016): The Changing Face of International Financial Development -Economics Letters, Rome, Italy.
25) S. De Vries (2018): Enhancing Participatory Democracy in Municipal Affairs through the Ward Committee System: Participatory M&E Approach.
26) S. Almalki (2016): Integrating Quantitative & Qualitative Data in Mixed Methods Research, Challenges and Benefits.
27) S.O Keya, W.O Kosura, A. Okeyo Mwai and T.K Kirina (2019): Prospects for Food Security in Kenya: Evidence from Five Counties, Nairobi, Kenya.
28) S. Pavithra, C.P Gracy & R. Saxena (2018): Innovations in Agricultural Marketing: A case Study of e-tendering system in Karnataka, India-Agricultural Economics.
29) T. Hart and L. Bank (2018): Urgent Interventions Needed to Build Capacity in District Land Reforms, Cape town, South Africa.
30) U. Matthiesen, (2017): Transformational pathways and Institutional Capacity Building: A case of German-Polish Twin City Governance& Institutional Capacity Program. Berlin, Germany.
31) World Bank (2019): Complexity of Managing Reform Interventions in the Context of Developing Economies, New York, USA.
32) Y. Dai, S Lin, H Zou (2019): Domestic Financial Reforms and Crisis Recoveries- International Journal of Finance
33) Z. Ismail (2019): The Public Sector Reform and Capacity Building in Small Island Developing States.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
