High-Quality Education and Research Collaboration Play a Key Role in the Success of University-Integrated Hubs: Case Study of Kenyatta University – Chandaria Centre for Innovation

Authors

  • Pascal Nyiringango

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.2304
Abstract views: 79
PDF downloads: 56

Keywords:

Education, Research, Innovation, Knowledge Transfer, Integrated Hubs, Ecosystem

Abstract

Purpose: This study was carried out to investigate the role played by High-quality education and research collaboration in the success of university-integrated hubs.

Methodology: The study used Kenyatta University –Chandaria Centre for Innovation as the case study. The study employed a qualitative method and was descriptive by design. To cover all the variables, the study employed a theoretical framework that combined; Social Network Theory, Resource-Based View (RBV) Theory, and Institutional Theory. The theoretical framework allowed the researcher to investigate the role of social networks, resources, and institutional arrangements of the university in the success of university-integrated hubs.

Findings: The study findings showed that indeed there has been collaboration between researcher and also between the university and the private sector. These social networks together with resources and institutional arrangements at the university have greatly contributed to the success of the ihub. Despite the success however, there are still challenges which include; poor funding for research, high internet costs, lack of national policy on intellectual property,  internal weaknesses included; poor state funding, lack of national policy on intellectual property, expensive internet services, non-commercialization of innovations and many others.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: For University embedded ihubs to achieve their intended goal, the study give several suggestions such as increased research funding, fast tracking national policy on intellectual property, access to financial assistance and many others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acs, Z. A. (2023). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. . Springer link.

Anatan. (2015). Conceptual issues in university to industry knowledge transfer Studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,, 711-717.

Armando & Salazar . (2017). The Resource-Based View and the Concept of Value The Role of Emergence in Value Creation. México: Universidad de Guadalajara.

Bozeman & Lee. (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science , 673-702.

Cummings & Teng. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: the key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 39-68.

De Vasconcelos et el. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. . Technological forecasting and social change,, 30-48.

Etzkowitz et al. (2007). University-Industry-Government Interaction: the Triple Helix Model for Innovation. Asia Pacific Tech, 13-24.

Florida. (2014). The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. The foeigner affiars JSTOR, 11-20.

Fukugawa, N. (2013). Heterogeneity among science parks with incubators as intermediaries ofresearch collaborations between startups and universities in Japan. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation,, 231-262.

Indonesia Participants. (2011). WIPO Regional Forum on University Industry Collaboration to Promote Technology Transfer. Hanoi.

Hansse and Solvoll. (2015). The importance of university facilities for student satisfaction at a Norwegian University. Facilities, Vol. 33 No. 13/14,, 744-759.

Kairit Tammets et al. (2021). Accelerating Digital Innovation in Schools through Regional Innovation Hubs and a Whole-School Mentoring Model. Tallinn : Tallinn University.

KeNIA. (2022). Kenya innovation outlool report . Nairobi: KeNIA.

Kilduff & Tsai. (2003). Social Networks and Organizations. SAGE.

Kimemia, D. (2022). Country report: Kenya county governments’ websites analysis report.

Lui et al. (2017). Social Network Theory. Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0092.

Milken Institute. (2022). Global Opportunity Index: Focus on Emerging Southeast Asia. Milken : Milken Institute .

Minguillo & Thelwall . (2015). "Which are the best innovation support infrastructures for universities? Evidence from R&D output and commercial activities," Scientometrics, . Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), , 1057-1081.

Mok & Yuda. (2021). Managing the COVID-19 pandemic crisis and changing welfare regimes. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1-12.

Phillips et el. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 1-6.

Porter, M. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Macmillan Business.

Schwartz & Hornych. (2010). Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2010). Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact ofincubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 485-495.

Scott, R. (2005). Social Theory (general). In G. R. (ed), Encyclopedia of Social Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Soni. (2020). Design your thinking: The mindsets, toolsets and skills sets for creative problem solving . Penguin Random house of India : New Delhi.

Unesco. (2004). Inclusive Education. Jakarta: UNESCO.

Yamada, R. ( 2015). Impact of Higher Education Policy on Private Universities in Japan: Analysis of governance and educational reform through survey responses. Tokyo: MEXT.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-09

How to Cite

Nyiringango, P. (2024). High-Quality Education and Research Collaboration Play a Key Role in the Success of University-Integrated Hubs: Case Study of Kenyatta University – Chandaria Centre for Innovation. African Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.47604/ajep.2304

Issue

Section

Articles