https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JCM <p>The Journal of Conflict Management (JCM) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes research and practice on various aspects of conflict management. The journal has an online ISSN of 2710-396X and a DOI prefix of 10.47604/jcm. The journal is indexed in several databases and has a fast and rigorous double-blinded peer review process. The authors keep the copyright of their articles and can distribute them for non-commercial purposes. The journal aims to provide a platform for sharing and exchanging insights and experiences on conflict management, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, dispute resolution, peacebuilding, and reconciliation. The journal also seeks to promote peace and harmony in the world by addressing the causes and consequences of conflict. Publishing in JCM is beneficial for researchers and practitioners who want to reach a wide and diverse audience, enhance their academic reputation and visibility, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge and practice in the field of conflict management.</p> IPRJB en-US Journal of Conflict Management 2710-396X <p>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.</p> https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JCM/article/view/2385 <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To aim of the study was to analyze influence of power dynamics and organizational justice on conflict outcomes and satisfaction</p> <p><strong>Methodology:</strong> This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.</p> <p><strong>Findings:</strong> Research shows power dynamics and organizational justice significantly impact conflict outcomes and satisfaction. Power imbalances exacerbate conflicts, leading to dissatisfaction. Unequal power distribution can escalate conflicts due to perceived unfairness. Conversely, organizational justice fosters positive outcomes and higher satisfaction levels. Fostering equitable power dynamics and promoting justice mitigate conflict and enhance satisfaction.</p> <p><strong>Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy:</strong> Social exchange theory, Equity theory &amp; Organizational justice theory may be used to anchor future studies on influence of power dynamics and organizational justice on conflict outcomes and satisfaction. Organizations should prioritize efforts to promote transparent decision-making processes and equitable power distribution to mitigate conflicts and enhance employee satisfaction. Policymakers should advocate for legislation and regulations that promote fairness and equality in organizational practices, including policies related to anti-discrimination, diversity, and inclusion.</p> John William Copyright (c) 2024 John William https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2024-03-02 2024-03-02 4 2 1 10 10.47604/jcm.2385